TB-8197 · REV C · Technical newsheet
Test & MeasurementDevice profile
REDEX claims 99.5% flatness accuracy at line exit with UMS PRO
REDEX USA claims 99.5% flatness accuracy at line exit for its UMS PRO, pairing high- and low-tension roll measurement with an integrated controller that cuts unregulated strip by up to 75 metres.
By Amara Osei3 min read621 words
Features
- REDEX UMS PRO claims up to 99.5% flatness measurement accuracy at the line exit under low tension
- The UMSi seamless roll in the S-Block zone achieves approximately 98% accuracy under high tension
- Integrated controller enables flatness correction immediately downstream of the leveler
- Early activation eliminates up to 75 metres of unregulated strip material per coil
- A Waterfall diagram visualises flatness along the entire coil length

REDEX USA has announced stated measurement accuracy of up to 99.5% for its Unflatness Measurement System PRO, a flatness gauge and controller combination for metal strip processing lines. The headline figure applies at the line exit, under low tension. A second stage, measuring under high tension, delivers approximately 98%.
The two figures deserve separation, because they measure different things under different conditions. The 99.5% claim belongs to the UMS-LT roll at line exit; the 98% figure comes from the UMSi seamless roll in the S-Block zone. Both are vendor datasheet numbers. REDEX did not publish the test conditions behind them, so buyers should treat them as stated accuracy rather than verified performance.
Why measure flatness at two tensions?
Flatness errors in rolled strip (deviations from a perfectly plane surface, typically manifesting as waves or buckles) behave differently depending on how hard you pull the material. Under high tension, the strip stretches taut and some flatness defects partially mask. Under low tension, the strip relaxes and reveals its true shape.
Measuring only one condition gives an incomplete picture. REDEX combines both: the UMSi seamless roll in the S-Block zone captures flatness under high tension, the UMS-LT roll at line exit captures it under low tension. Together they cover the full tension spectrum the strip experiences across the production line. That matters because strip geometry variations ripple downstream, affecting processing, material utilisation and finished component quality.
The takeaway: one tension tells you half the story, and REDEX is selling the whole book.
What does the integrated controller add?
UMS PRO is not a gauge with a screen. An integrated REDEX controller performs proactive flatness regulation, applying corrective action immediately after the leveler (the machine that removes shape defects from the strip). Conventional setups measure, then let downstream inspection catch what the leveler missed. This one closes the loop at the source.
The control side includes:
- dynamic switching between high- and low-tension measurement rolls
- adaptive target regulation
- a Waterfall diagram displaying flatness across the entire coil length, letting operators examine variations coil-wide and judge process consistency
Correcting at the leveler, not after inspection, is the whole point.
How much scrap does it save?
REDEX quantifies one specific gain. Because the system activates before the strip enters the high-tension zone, it eliminates up to 75 metres of material that would otherwise remain unregulated — strip passing through without closed-loop correction. That is head and tail material that producers currently write off or risk shipping out of tolerance.
Seventy-five metres per coil adds up. The company frames it as reduced scrap and lower production cost, which is reasonable arithmetic even without a plant-specific payback figure.
What REDEX claims versus what's proven
Strip the announcement down and the measurable claims are: up to 99.5% accuracy at low-tension line exit, roughly 98% in the high-tension S-Block, and up to 75 metres of unregulated material eliminated. Everything else — tighter tolerances, better material utilisation, improved process consistency — follows from those numbers rather than standing independently.
No independent test data, calibration method or reference standard appears in the announcement. For a system sold on measurement accuracy, that omission is notable. Accuracy percentages without a stated reference are marketing language until a customer's own gauge R&R (gauge repeatability and reproducibility study) says otherwise.
The verdict: the dual-tension architecture is a sensible answer to a real metrology problem, and integrated correction beats after-the-fact inspection. Prospective buyers should now ask REDEX for the test conditions behind the 99.5% figure — and for validation data from a line running their own material, at their own tensions.
More information: www.redexusa.com.
By Amara Osei
via redexusa.com (Original)
Filed under
- flatness-measurement
- metal-strip-processing
- closed-loop-control
- gauge-r-r
- redex-ums-pro
More from Amara Osei
Show full bio
Senior reporter covering people, launches and day-to-day practice in Instruments, test and measurement at Testbench Report.
94 articles
Application notes
- Gage Block Calibration: One Degree of Temperature Can Exceed the Entire Tolerance
- NIST Releases Five-Swatch Textile Standard for NIR Fiber ID
- L100NX Form Error Drops to 10 µm as Metrology Goes Predictive
- Three LPG Vessels Passed Every Test, Then Failed at 10 Bar
- HP-FX brings micron-scale engine inspection to MRO shop floors